vidaXL Stacking Dining Chairs 6 pcs Solid Teak Wood

• Material: Fine sanded teak hard wood with waterbase finish
• Dimensions: 24.4" x 22.2" x 37" (W x D x H)
• Seat width: 18.5"
• Seat depth: 17.9"
• Seat height from the ground: 17.7"
• Armrest height from the ground: 25.2"
• Suitable for both outdoor and indoor use
• Delivery contains:
• 6 x Dining chair
• California Proposition 65
  

  WARNING: California's Proposition 65

These wooden stacking dining chairs, with a slatted, elegant design, will make a timeless addition to your garden, patio or dining room.

Constructed from extremely durable teak hard wood, this piece of teak furniture has been seasoned, kiln dried and then fine sanded to give a very smooth appearance. Teak wood is known for its exceptional strength and weather resistance, making it far more suitable for garden furniture than any other kind of wood. Teak wood is the perfect choice if you want to purchase a long lasting piece of garden furniture.

A beautiful finish is applied to give the wood a warm color. Thanks to the ergonomically designed back and armrests, these garden chairs are comfortable to sit on. The outdoor chairs can be stacked to save space when not in use.

Note: In order to extend the life of your outdoor furniture, we recommend you to clean it regularly and do not leave it outdoors without protection unnecessarily.

Clean: Use a mild soap solution

Storing: If possible, store in a cool, dry place indoors. If the product is stored outdoors, protect it with a waterproof cover. Wipe and dry the excess water or snow from flat surfaces after a rain or snowfall. Allow sufficient air circulation to avoid moisture-related damage.

• Material: Fine sanded teak hard wood with waterbase finish
• Dimensions: 24.4" x 22.2" x 37" (W x D x H)
• Seat width: 18.5"
• Seat depth: 17.9"
• Seat height from the ground: 17.7"
• Armrest height from the ground: 25.2"
• Suitable for both outdoor and indoor use
• Delivery contains:
• 6 x Dining chair
• California Proposition 65
  

  WARNING: California's Proposition 65